Signed, Cautious and Confused Scholar: The Perils of Writing a Religious History Column
Charity R Carney
I probably have no business writing for the local paper. But
here I am, in rural East Texas, spreading the gospel of religious history in a
region that thinks it already knows everything about that subject. For today’s
post, I thought I’d share my most recent column (featured on the Religion page
of Nacogdoches’ Daily Sentinel) and
to ask how others handle writing for a non-academic audience. The following did cause a bit of a stir at the paper and adjusted placement because of its subject, which pushed me to consider how to best handle future articles and to seek the advice of others.
“More churches
evolving to society, accepting LGBTQ church members”
Daily Sentinel,
7/13/2013
You can no longer
“pray away the gay”—at least not according to leaders of the former Exodus
International. In June of 2013, the same month that the Supreme Court struck
down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), Exodus International closed its doors.
This decision is huge news for the religious right and gay rights advocates,
alike. The organization was the leading provider of “reorientation therapy” for
gays and lesbians in an attempt to make them straight or celibate. In an open
letter, the leader of Exodus, Alan Chambers, apologized to the gay community
“for years of undue suffering and judgment at the hands of the organization and
the Church as a whole.” Chambers admitted that Exodus hurt many people and did
not defend the rights of gays and lesbians when it should have. Some groups
have lashed out against Exodus, but the announcement has also received
considerable support from some evangelicals. Christians can be gay, too, they
proclaim, and the ranks of homosexual believers is growing.
While many Christians
are still openly anti-gay marriage and culture, lately many major pastors and
evangelical leaders have come out in favor of it. And they may be on to
something. One of the most impressive things about evangelical history is that
the church always adapts—its rapid and impressive growth is largely due to the
adaptation to current trends and to societies’ needs. This recent move towards
inclusion may draw the ire of fellow Christians, but it will also help expand
the congregations of gay-friendly churches. In a March interview, Rob Bell (former
pastor of Mars Hill Baptist Church and a popular Christian speaker) urged
Christians to love and accept all individuals despite sexual orientation. Bell
argued, “I am for marriage. I am for fidelity. I am for love, whether it’s a
man and women, a woman and a woman, a man and a man.” No matter the feelings of
some opponents of gay rights, he said, ultimately “the ship has sailed” in
terms of trying to prevent homosexual marriage. And the recent Supreme Court
decision has proved his statement. “I think this is the world we are living
in,” Bell insisted, “and we need to affirm people wherever they are.”
To be sure, Bell and
the folks at Exodus International (which is reforming as Reduce Fear to promote
an open dialogue about sexuality), are not representative of the entire
Christian community. There are rifts in the evangelical ranks, especially when
it comes to homosexuality. When the Boy Scouts recently altered its policies to
allow gay members, churches across the nation severed their ties with the
organization. But there are growing numbers of Christians who embrace gay
rights and who are organizing to try to impact other believers. The Gay
Christian Network, for instance, offers “safe spaces” for straight and gay
Christians to build friendships and, simultaneously, compassion for each other.
The Alliance of Baptists joined with the Baptist Peace Fellowship of North
America and Association of Welcoming and Affirming Baptists to publish a huge
volume on accepting LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transsexual, queer) members,
which includes biblical justifications for inviting homosexuals to share their
pews. Across the country, more and more churches are opening their doors,
hearts, and minds to gays and lesbians. Some pastors, like Sandra Turnbull,
have made inclusion their mission and Rev. Dr. Mel White and his partner Gary
Nixon started SoulForce—a Christian organization that relies on the nonviolent
resistance taught by Martin Luther King, Jr., and Gandhi to promote gay rights.
Christian colleges are the sites for much of this change, too, as LGBTQ support
groups have sprouted on campuses like Wheaton. Baylor University has shifted its
policies to be more open to students with different sexual preferences, as
evinced by its acceptance of star (and out) lesbian basketball player, Brittany
Griner,
Despite varying and
extremely conflicting viewpoints, it is apparent that the larger culture is
changing and many Christians are adjusting their rhetoric and beliefs regarding
homosexuality. This adaptation and the myriad of evangelical responses to it is
not a divergence from evangelical history but is perfectly in line with past
trends. Evangelicalism particularly is a malleable faith and is very good at
adjusting to the needs of the larger culture—perhaps the shift towards gay
marriage is simply representative of some of that adjustment. Although there is
conflict and disagreement, it is apparent that instead of “praying away the
gay” some Christians have decided to pave the way for gays and to bring them
into the already diverse evangelical family. And that decision will certainly
determine the next phase of church history.
Admittedly, I’m not too far into the columnist gig. This
recent publication is the fourth one I’ve written for the paper, which serves a
community of about 30,000 near the Texas/Louisiana border. Even with a fairly
small distribution (8-9,000), there is a degree of anxiety that accompanies writing for a
non-academic audience. I think my first three columns indicate that I’m fairly
gun shy (I kept to evangelical themes and wrote about the history of the local
Methodist congregation and one about Baptist schisms) but the lack of recent
religious news in the local paper drove me to write one on a more contemporary
topic. My question for you loyal bloggers and blog-ites is: how do you handle
relating to the local community, if you have taken on that particular challenge?
I know many of you give talks, lectures, write for the general public—do you
find any challenges particular to discussing religious history and how do you
write around or address local prejudices/ideologies/misconceptions regarding
certain faiths or beliefs? I’m intending for the column to be more inclusive
and cover other non-Christian groups in the region but have not introduced that
element yet [knees knock]. Texas is admittedly a Lone Star in many ways with its
own unique challenges but I would be interested to hear how other professional
religious historians interact with “lay” communities. Also, if anyone would like
to toss around an idea for the column’s title, that would be much appreciated.
I’ve toyed with some lame ideas like “Faith Traditions.” Savvy names like “Juvenile
Instructor” are already taken (because Chris is brilliant) and “Charity’s Religion
Corner” sounds like a Nickelodeon special or early morning TBN show. Advice and suggestions welcome.
Signed, well you get the point.
Comments
Re: the title: I think "Faith Traditions" is actually pretty good, in part because of the multiple meanings one could read into it.