Skip to main content

Posts

Featured

Do Catholic Historians Need to Define Catholicism?

Historians of evangelicalism are very interested in defining evangelicalism. It would seem obvious that scholars of a certain field would be dedicated to defining their object of study, but historians of evangelicalism go about this task with an admirable gusto. The act of defining is central to the field. Historian David Bebbington’s famous definition, the Bebbington Quadrilateral – evangelicalism as biblicism, crucicentrism, conversionism, and activism – has framed the conversation since 1989. As I listened to the excellent papers delivered by historians at the Noll Conference in March 2018, I began to wonder why Catholic historians do not seem so interested in defining their object of study, Catholicism.

Certainly we do not have quadrilateral. But should we have one?

Latest Posts

CFP: Call for Proposals for edited volume on Religion and Black Feminist Public Intellectuals

Paige Patterson, Beth Moore, and the History of Evangelical Women's Education

Five Questions with Catherine Osborne

5 Questions With James Chappel about How the Catholic Church became Modern in the 1930s

Interview with Adam Laats on Fundamentalist U

Religion in the Gilded Age: A Review of Richard White's The Republic for Which It Stands

New Books in American Religious History: 2018 Year in Preview, Part Two (May-July)

CFP: Newberry Seminar on Religion in the Americas

Know Your Archives: The YMCA and Historiographic Potential

New and Improved ACHA Graduate Student Summer Research Grants