Merritt of the Mainline
As we have been enjoying the interviews with Matthew Hedstrom's new book, as we joyfully anticipate Elesha Coffman's, and as many gear up for that one night of the year we head to church (which happens to often be the longest service of the year), I wanted to introduce the writer-speaker-blogger-reverend who is renewing my faith in church (dare I say reviving): Carol Howard Merritt <@carolhoward>. Ordained in the PC-USA, Merritt writes for Christian Century, the Huffington Post, and a host of other media outlets. She co-hosts God Complex Radio, which should be back on the air with the new year and is the author of several path-breaking books on church life. Her most recent, Reframing Hope: Vital Ministry in a New Generation, has me rethinking not only my approach to church life, but also to how I conduct my classes and form my "tribes" with my graduate students. In the foreword, Diana Butler Bass calls it an "elegant meditation" and a "practical sermon" from "a young mainline pastor in the postmodern world."
Merritt represents something old and something new. She emerged from and is connected to the tradition of the mainline, but advocates many of the de-centering, postcolonial elements considered hallmarks of the "emergent church." But she defies the emergent category for its tendency to replicate already established cultures of power (where white men lead whether preaching in suits or determining the shape of the discussion in jeans and t-shirts). Reverend Merritt has been making her own road, and it's one I think religious historians now and in the future will want to notice.
Merritt represents something old and something new. She emerged from and is connected to the tradition of the mainline, but advocates many of the de-centering, postcolonial elements considered hallmarks of the "emergent church." But she defies the emergent category for its tendency to replicate already established cultures of power (where white men lead whether preaching in suits or determining the shape of the discussion in jeans and t-shirts). Reverend Merritt has been making her own road, and it's one I think religious historians now and in the future will want to notice.
Q: Can you tell us about your
college and graduate school trajectory? Was there anything about religion in
history that influenced you - personally or more globally?
I was
a sixteen-year-old conservative Southern Baptist when I applied for college. I
knew I wanted to be in some sort of religious occupation, but because of my
background, I didn’t have any notion that I—as a woman—could be a pastor. In
the mid-90s, went to Moody Bible Institute in order to become a missionary.
While
I was at Moody, I lived in downtown Chicago in a zip code that had one of the
highest income disparities in our nation. I’d walk from my jobs on the Gold
Coast to volunteer in Cabrini Green. As I mentored kids at after-school
programs and shopped for the disabled and elderly, I became disenchanted by President
Reagan’s trickle down economics. It was clear that Cabrini was not getting a
drop of the wealth that poured on the streets of the Gold Coast. The children I
worked with in one area were concerned about their upcoming piano lessons,
while children a few blocks away had anxiety about their personal safety.
From
my limited perspective, the Religious Right was the only Christian political
response that surrounded me and they were gaining strength by upholding
economic policies that further damaged the poor.
I
hungered for some sort of good news in all of this, so I began to read Walter
Rauschenbusch and Dorothy Day and found great inspiration in the Social Gospel
movement. Rauschenbusch and Day led me to read Gustavo Gutierrez and Paulo
Friere. Eventually, the Liberationists introduced me to Feminist Theology. Thanks
to a good library and a lot of trips to the used bookstores, my fundamentalist
Bible College helped me to get an education in the God of the oppressed.
After
four years at Moody, I joined the Presbyterian Church (USA) and decided to go
to graduate school. I attended Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary, where
I studied under Dr. Cynthia Rigby who opened up a greater world of feminist, womanist,
and mujerista theology; Dr. Stacy Johnson who exposed me to postmodern thought;
Dr. Ismael Garcia who taught me ethics and justice through Hispanic eyes; and
Dr. Ellen Babinsky who worked with great care to make sure to introduce me to a
history of mysticism that would be intellectually and socially compelling.
Q: Your books, Reframing Hope and Tribal Church, both emphasize the notion of "generations." How
do you see the recent shifts in church life and what do you mean by
generations?
When demographic,
organizational, economic and other shifts occur, church leaders often don’t
understand how their common life together—on a small scale—fits into those
larger movements. Much of my work helps Mainline congregations to appreciate how
what is happening to them around their church board meetings relates to the
changes in the society and culture.
For
instance, when we look at the demographic aspects in my denomination, the
Presbyterian Church (USA), we’re seeing devastating effects of being a largely
rural, white, older church. As agriculture changes, areas where there were
5,000 farmers and a community of banks, post offices, hardware stores and
schools supporting them have now been reduced to 5 agro-businesses. The bank,
post office, stores and schools are closing and younger generations need to
migrate to urban areas for employment.
Yet,
when we talk to rural pastors and leaders, they often worry that it’s some sort
of spiritual, evangelistic, leadership or moral failure that caused their
attendance numbers to drop.
In
addition, when we look at the ways in which a new generation organizes itself
and communicates, it stands in stark contrast to how our denominational church
functions. For instance, when working with Occupy, they were much more action
and pragmatic oriented. In each General Assembly (that’s what Occupy calls
their meetings), the group brings up a problem or an action, then they use hand
motions, social media and technologies to mobilize and communicate immediately.
If we
contrast that with our churches, we often have a standing committee that meets
so that we can discuss a particular function of the congregation (worship,
evangelism, stewardship), and we spend much of our time discussing how we will
be doing everything this month the exact same way that we did it last month.
When a change or action needs to happen, we move into a season of discernment
so that we can pray, discuss, and table the problem until it goes away. Of
course, there is much wisdom in our traditional church structures, but they
often clash culturally with the way younger generations operate.
Economically,
the changes between denominational churches and emerging generations feel
particularly stark. Younger generations have been facing rising student loan
debt, high unemployment, erratic housing costs, low health insurance coverage, exploitative
internship expectations, and stagnant wages.
The
church has been largely silent about these issues—except for those who work in
Sociology of Religion. Some sociologists have identified this important
societal injustice as an inability to grow up. Many have offered to add another
life phase—an extended adolescence—as if to say that these problems rise from a
desire to hike in the Himalayas for a few years, rather than a system of
injustice.
My use
of “generations” can be confusing. When I wrote Tribal Church, I was talking about ministry to a particular age group,
so I used “generation” to refer to people in their twenties and thirties. In Reframing Hope, my definitions changed a
bit, and I used “generation” to talk about a particular chronological period. In
most of my work, I’m describing changes that often reflect—but are not limited
to—Generation X and Millennials.
Q: Do members of your
congregation care about "history" and what histories seem to grab
them (either during sermons or other discussions)?
Yes. It’s
amazing how much history shapes and inspires a congregation, and I loved
introducing historic narratives into the general stories that a body tells
itself. In sermons and classes, I tried to connect the church to its liberating
past. Not only because it’s often unknown, but it can also encourage people to
become a part of a larger movement that spans generations.
Usually,
people are interested in the histories that immediately connect them to who
they have become. Our congregation in D.C. told the stories of the Civil War.
Like many of the churches in that area, their sanctuary was used as a hospital
for both the North and the South, so we would imagine how bloodstains on a
sanctuary floor forms a congregation’s calling and identity. I hope that we
became a more compassionate, caring congregation because of it.
When I
served Louisiana, they told the history of the Cajun and Creole people. They
explained how their people were in Acadie when the Great Expulsion occurred. The
women and children went to church, and the British captured them and put them
on boats. When the men followed, they were captured as well. The Cajuns told
stories about how they were sold as slaves down the east coast until they
settled in Louisiana. Their history was not just written in books, but it
pulsed through their vibrant, music, food and festival traditions.
I also
preached at Revivals with the Prophetess Perot and we would meet in a House of
Prayer. The building had been transported from a plantation and its walls were
soaked with history. They told me that the House of Prayer was the one place on
the plantation where slaves met, without any oversight or fear. Within those
walls, in that safe place, men and women told their stories. The sanctuary was
a refuge in every sense of the word.
In
many ways, histories grab them, but congregations are also fascinating
receptacles of history as well.
Q: If you could narrate the
history of "progressive Christianity" where would you start? What
major events or people would you include in the story?
I
would start by defining what I mean by progressive Christianity. Since it’s a
fairly new designation (at least in its wide usage), it has a very present and
contextual feel to it. It’s also a particularly political aspect to it (which I
sometimes find problematic). For me, being a progressive Christian does not
mean that a person aligns himself or herself to one particular party or mimic
the talking points of a favorite politician. Instead, progressive Christians
typically have a core longing to “do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with
God” and we hope to love our neighbors as we love ourselves.
Those
directives take us from understanding our faith as simply a matter of
individual piety and move us to think and act systemically. Working for
justice, we realize that we need to make structural changes that will allow all
people in our society to have a sense of liberation, security, fairness,
opportunity, and equality. These things have an effect on the ways we wage war,
and many would further extend those aspects of justice to not only include
humans, but all creation.
So, if
I were to narrate progressive Christianity, I would look to people whose faith
compelled them to work for justice (focusing mostly on the United States, but understanding
the movement is global) and I would include those who may have worked toward cultural,
political and religious liberation even if the term “progressive Christian” was
never used to describe them.
I would
focus on stories of people who fought for the poor, making sure that there were
child labor laws and protections for workers. I would recognize the countless
men and women who worked with the Civil Rights movement, feminist movement, and
peace movements. We could explore the stories of men and women who work for the
rights of immigrants and refugees, those who fought alongside the elderly and
those who demand education and healthcare children. We have many who are
working for the rights for same-gender couples and those who face
discrimination because of their sexual orientation. I would lift up those who
expand our understanding and care to include the earth.
The
stories of those working for justice because their spiritual depth moves them
to action are overwhelming. And I would take care to note that these ideas of
liberation spread in countless ways and mediums--in our classrooms, books, journalism,
preaching, music, art, dance, festivals, and technology.
Q: Are you working on a book now?
Can you tell us anything about it?
I’m
working on a couple of projects. I’m finishing up a handbook for recovering
fundamentalists and I’m developing a book on at how people of faith are
responding to economic issues, particularly in light of the Occupy movement.
Comments
I think one difficult about writing about current religious movements is that there can be a tendency to universalize particular experience. But then there are times when there are *so* many people who seem to be trailing the same path, that it's good to point it out.