"The song lifted her up high": Jeff Sharlet on Faith and Faithlessness



7 comments
Kelly Baker

Beefsteaks when I'm hungry
Something tall and cool when I'm dry
Give me greenbacks when the times are hard
Sweet heaven when I die--Blue Dogs, "Sweet Heaven When I Die"

While reading and re-reading Jeff Sharlet's Sweet Heaven When I Die: Faith, Faithlessness, and the Country in Between, a couple of songs replayed over and over in my head. His lovely and haunting collections of essays made my thinking musical. Perhaps, it is the beauty of his language, the lyrical quality of his descriptions, that direct me to hymns and pop songs (which is on my taste, not Sharlet's). Perhaps, it is because his reflections on religion, trauma, belief, unbelief, practice and loss feel like poetry. I cannot read his book without music, so songs emerged as the beginnings of my analysis. Every time I started to review this book, the music came to me first. Music evoked spaces I once inhabited as well as spaces in which I currently reside. Thus, I cannot review his book without referring to the accompaniment of music (and please note that John D. Boy at the Immanent Frame also feels this way). Hopefully, Sharlet will not mind since music appears in his work from Cornel West as "blues man" to a club named "the Church" to Creedence Clearwater Revival to Dock Boggs' "Down South Blues" to the songs playing at Sweet Fanny Adams, the motel and bar. Maybe the music even puzzles him a bit too.

The first song starts playing as soon as I see the title, Sweet Heaven When I Die, which my brain somehow translates into "When I die, Hallelujah, by and by" from the Christian hymn, "I'll Fly Away." I misread his title every time I puzzle over the image on the cover. Somehow humming this tune seemed to fit with Sharlet's explorations and excavations of the religious lives of Americans from his college sweetheart's continual return to the Bible to make meaning to the martyrdom of an anarchist to militarization of Christian youth in BattleCry to worship with German evangelicals and the construction of purity. Sharlet, as Brent Plate puts it, catalogs "weird religion." Sharlet's approach both deeply personal and documentary showcases individuals trying to make sense of their lives, their traumas, as well as attempts to create meaning out of chaos. His interlocutors try to find justice, try to heal themselves and others and try to navigate expected and unexpected losses.


Sharlet gives us glimpses into American religions writ small, individuals navigating worlds of faith. He writes about Molly Knott Chilson, his college girlfriend, "Her liberalism became Christian, and her Christianity was gentle and yet thick with the blood of scripture: the darkest passages of the prophets to which she's always been drawn..." (12). Or Cornel West: "His religion is that of the night side of scripture, the prophets of the Hebrew Bible and a Christ story as awful as it is redeeming" (50). Or Chava Rosenburg's writing about the Holocaust: "Beauty, not God, sustained her" (132). Vera Schnabel, his interpreter at the German Church of the Way, embraced both Jesus and America via music (and she also hums "I'll Fly Away). Sharlet writes about her conversion:

The song lifted her up high, and up there in the sky she was an angel, just like her black brothers and sisters. She wasn't an America, she wasn't German, she was nothing: She disappeared into the clouds and came out the other side a believer (153).

Moreover, Sharlet catalogs the development of American fundamentalism from the perspective of not only Ron Luce, the founder of BattleCry, but also the young adults at his Honor Academy as they struggle with sin, sexuality and "secularism." The specters of gender loom large in "She Said Yes," as Honor Academy attendees confront limited gender norms as sexuality becomes the language for and of sin. Moreover, Sharlet does not shy away from issues that make religious people and scholars of religion nervous. He tries to figure out the "price tag" of religious movements without turning to discussions of charlatanism or inautheniticity. While following a New Age healer, he notes, "You get what you pay for" (198) without snark. Capitalism resides in religion and spirituality (just ask Darren Grem or Richard King).


The second, likely more trite, song is a pop song. Sharlet cajoles, "Pop is religion, a source of stories and a conduit for myths, the smoke and mirrors by which large groups of people get together and...get 'vulnerable'" (225-226). I heard it on the radio (it stuck with me, haunted me, maybe). "If I Die Young" by the Band Perry reflects on loss, trauma and the "sharp knife of a short life" in a slightly off-kilter melody that reverberates. Sharlet also navigates loss, trauma and the lack of meaning (see also John Corrigan on meaninglessness). Many of the essays circle the trauma of every day life, unintended hurt and the loss of loved ones. In "Bad Moon Rising," the memory of the author's dead mother and uncle haunts while accompanied to the CCR song of the title. Cornel West discusses "death shudders," despair and coming to terms with the "reality of death, ordinary life--waiting to die, living as you never will" (60). In the last essay of the collection, "Born, Again," the life of Dock Boggs is juxtaposed with the loss of a friend's infant and a meditation on "quitting." Sharlet pens:

An input of energy results in motion. Simple math, nothing more than 2+2=4. Pages pile up and become books; babies grow up and become children.

The belief that either will necessarily prosper...that "things will work out," is grotesque: tragic and comic at the same time, funny because it's sad, sad because it's funny, awful because it just might be true. Seen from a distance, through a telescope or at the far remove of "art," a story or a painting or a poem or a song [or scholarship?], both the most mundane of expectations...are the painful spectacle, grievous mismatches of desire and power, of want and the ability to make it so (248-249).

All of Sharlet's interlocutors, his conversants, his interviewees, seek to manage trauma. How do we manage when ordinary life is about wounds rather than hope? How do we make sense of hurt, trauma, death, quitting, capitalism, consumerism, spirituality, music, art, or religion? (Or do we?) What do we do in the grips of a "death shudder"? Sharlet's Sweet Heaven When I Die flirts with old questions of suffering and meaning while suggesting that folks are just "trying to become human" but "not there yet" (259).

But this also proves useful to those of us who "write" religion as our scholarship. Sharlet's work pushes me to think about how we write the lives of our contemporaries or those long dead. How do we write trauma? How are scholars making meaning out of the messiness of individual lives? Or should we embrace the meaningless as an analytic frame too? What happens when we pay attention to religion writ small? What kinds of stories do we gain? And what kind of stories do we lose? The work evokes, and songs become my analysis, which makes me wonder how art can be helpful in our interpretations (Jason Bivins and Julie Bryne likely have much more to say about this). Why does this book come to me in song?

7 comments:

Curtis J. Evans at: December 5, 2011 at 6:02 PM said...

Kelly,
thanks for a moving and profound reflection on Sharlet's book. I will have to read it when my schedule permits. Your questions at the end of your essay, especially how do we write trauma? and how do we make meaning out of the messiness of individual lives? are two that I often wrestle with and the latter frequently comes to mind whenever I find myself neatly wrapping up a lecture on some aspect of religion in American history. The second question is a also a reminder that neatness and analytical rigor can often impose an order on what you rightly point to as messy and sometimes apparently meaningless experiences. I suppose what is often lost in "religion writ small," especially to the extent that it highlights moments of ecstasy, the idiosyncratic nature of an individual's experience, severe loss, extreme pain, and existential struggles with meaning, is that it can tend to minimize the regular, stable and recurring (and perhaps even uninteresting, depending on one's perspective) features of religious experience. In no way do I mean that this is a necessary or intrinsic loss from close attention to individual experiences, but rather it seems to me to be what has been a tradeoff in narratives of this sort.
Thanks again. Your post reminded me of your persistent and poignant foundational questions (one that you eloquently posed to a panel at the AAR in San Francisco) about how and why we "write" religion.

Kelly Baker at: December 6, 2011 at 7:44 AM said...

Curtis, thanks for taking my questions a step farther and offering analysis of the benefits and costs of "religion writ small." Like you, I am struck by the tidiness of my narratives in my classrooms as well as in my work. Sometimes the step back from individuals offers clarity and organizing principles as you suggest, which I think are just as important as the messiness of individual lives.

An acknowledgment of this trade off goes a long way to thinking through how we write about trauma and disaster in particular. I think particularly of Bob Orsi's Between Heaven and Earth, which uses deeply personal, individual stories to show readers something structural about the Catholic Church's approach to suffering pre-Vatican II, especially in his essay, "Mildred, is it fun to be a cripple?" (http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s7884.html) on his Uncle Sal. But again, I am torn because I think it is a misstep to ignore what you term "the regular, stable and recurring...features of religious experience." This stability needs to be analyzed too.

I guess part of what I am gesturing to is that certain religious expressions require a different type of writing, which I think was clear at the AIDS panel at AAR/SBL. Trauma and disaster might require a different style of writing, but I am still unsure. What do you think?

John G. Turner at: December 6, 2011 at 9:48 AM said...

Thanks for this post, Kelly. I love Sharlet's essays and will put this on my Christmas reading list. Gospel According to the Klan is also on my list.

John Boy at: December 6, 2011 at 4:11 PM said...

Yes! This book is absolutely inseparable from music. For me it was, oddly enough, Das Racist:
http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2011/09/23/america-plus-nothing/

Kelly Baker at: December 7, 2011 at 6:58 AM said...

John, I just finished your review, and I'll add it to the original post. Thanks!

Mike at: December 8, 2011 at 5:27 AM said...

Kelly, thanks for this great reflection, review, or is it a meditation? Either way, thanks.

I just finished teaching definitions of religion from Tweed and Geertz, both of whom puts suffering front and center in their conceptions of what religion does. In both cases their emphasis is on making sense of suffering and learning how to suffer. But I wonder to what extent our scholarship on suffering in religion mimics this function of religions. To what extent are our academic treatments of suffering doing Geertzian meaning making but with bigger words? I'm not sure. I haven't written much on these topics, but I'd be curious to hear more from those who have.

Jeff at: December 9, 2011 at 4:41 PM said...

This blog touches on some themes in Kevin Schultz's book "Tri-Faith America." In his book, Schultz identifies a blending of the major US religions to form a quasi-homogeneity between the faiths. Music and religion have been intertwined for thousands of years. However in today's world, the popularity and accessibility of music have allowed some religious bands to hit the mainstream at an unprecedented level. Some listeners might not even realize the religious roots of the music.

newer post older post