tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37589721331585843.post5801806834835243420..comments2024-03-26T11:33:59.219-06:00Comments on Religion in American History: Redeemer IIPaul Harveyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13881964303772343114noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37589721331585843.post-74880343872026257252014-11-17T23:35:13.979-07:002014-11-17T23:35:13.979-07:00Unfortunately, the results of yet another theologi...Unfortunately, the results of yet another theologico-political Rorschach test.<br /><br />It's not history. This all needs to be placed in a different folder.<br /><br />As one reviewer nailed it:<br /><br /><i>If it is permissible to grant a political role to “progressive evangelism,” why is it any less legitimate to grant a similar role to those whose evangelism “emphasized free-market capitalism, paid scant attention to human rights or the plight of minorities, and asserted the importance of military might as resistance to communism”?</i><br /><br />Whose evangelicalism is it, anyway? The historian can only measure, not vote.<br /><br /><br /><br />Tom Van Dykehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07121072404143877596noreply@blogger.com